Bellamack vs Woodroffe

Woodroffe scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 18/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Woodroffe skews owner-occupied (56%), Bellamack runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

Buying in Bellamack or Woodroffe?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Bellamack? The free selling guide

Bellamack and Woodroffe side by side

MeasureBellamackWoodroffe
Price and market
Median house–$427,000
Median unit–$308,880
Renting
House rent$420/wk$370/wk
Unit rent$360/wk$360/wk
Owner occupied38.0%56.0%
Renter occupied58.0%41.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1616
Average ICSEA943943
Lifestyle and people
Walk score1218
Transit score00
Bike score7590
Population2,4233,175
Median age2933
Climate
Annual rainfall1773 mm1773 mm
Mean max, January32.3°C32.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Bellamack vs Woodroffe: common questions

Which is more walkable, Bellamack or Woodroffe?

Woodroffe scores 18/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.