Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bellmount Forest vs Lade Vale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bellmount Forest edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bellmount Forest (1056) sits above Lade Vale (1041).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bellmount Forest edges out on average school ICSEA (1056 vs 1041). Lade Vale also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBellmount Forest vs Lade Vale

Common questions

Does Bellmount Forest or Lade Vale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bellmount Forest scores 1056 vs 1041 in Lade Vale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bellmount Forest
Metric
Lade Vale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$420/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
120
Population
158
49
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1056
Avg ICSEA
1041

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).