Side by sideSuburb comparison

Brukunga vs Dawesley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Dawesley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Dawesley (1043) sits above Brukunga (1025). Dawesley skews owner-occupied (97%), Brukunga runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Dawesley edges out on average school ICSEA (1043 vs 1025). Dawesley also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBrukunga vs Dawesley

Common questions

Does Brukunga or Dawesley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Dawesley scores 1043 vs 1025 in Brukunga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Brukunga
Metric
Dawesley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$345/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$262/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$290/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
97.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
3.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
5
400
Population
316
42
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
9
1025
Avg ICSEA
1043

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).