Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bungeet vs Almonds.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bungeet edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bungeet (996) sits above Almonds (993). Bungeet skews owner-occupied (62%), Almonds runs more rental-dense (42% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bungeet edges out on average school ICSEA (996 vs 993). Bungeet also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBungeet vs Almonds

Common questions

Does Bungeet or Almonds have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bungeet scores 996 vs 993 in Almonds. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bungeet
Metric
Almonds

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$231/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$196/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$179/wk
62.0%
Owner occupied
42.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
29
Population
31
39
Median age
30

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
996
Avg ICSEA
993

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).