Burnie vs Cooee

Burnie scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 30/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cooee skews owner-occupied (63%), Burnie runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

Buying in Burnie or Cooee?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Burnie? The free selling guide

Burnie and Cooee side by side

MeasureBurnieCooee
Renting
House rent$240/wk$240/wk
Unit rent$240/wk$225/wk
Owner occupied48.0%63.0%
Renter occupied51.0%34.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1313
Average ICSEA941941
Lifestyle and people
Walk score10030
Transit score00
Bike score6020
Population693597
Median age4244
Climate
Annual rainfall922 mm922 mm
Mean max, January21.3°C21.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cooee has a heavier family-household mix (62% vs 46%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Burnie vs Cooee: common questions

Which is more walkable, Burnie or Cooee?

Burnie scores 100/100 on walkability vs 30/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.