Side by sideSuburb comparison

Calvert vs Lanefield.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lanefield edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lanefield (941) sits above Calvert (938).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lanefield edges out on average school ICSEA (941 vs 938).

Common questionsCalvert vs Lanefield

Common questions

Does Calvert or Lanefield have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lanefield scores 941 vs 938 in Calvert. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Calvert
Metric
Lanefield

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$263/wk
Owner occupied
73.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
6,007
Population
97
43
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
6
938
Avg ICSEA
941

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).