Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lanefield vs The Bluff.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. The Bluff edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving The Bluff (947) sits above Lanefield (941).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

The Bluff edges out on average school ICSEA (947 vs 941).

Common questionsLanefield vs The Bluff

Common questions

Does Lanefield or The Bluff have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), The Bluff scores 947 vs 941 in Lanefield. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lanefield
Metric
The Bluff

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$263/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
14.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
97
Population
6,007
53
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
9
941
Avg ICSEA
947

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).