Chaffey vs Renmark

Renmark scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 80/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Chaffey skews owner-occupied (81%), Renmark runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

Buying in Chaffey or Renmark?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Chaffey? The free selling guide

Chaffey and Renmark side by side

MeasureChaffeyRenmark
Renting
House rent–$470/wk
Unit rent–$310/wk
Owner occupied81.0%57.0%
Renter occupied8.0%37.0%
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA962962
Lifestyle and people
Walk score080
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1894,705
Median age4844
Climate
Annual rainfall253 mm254 mm
Mean max, January33.4°C33.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Chaffey has a heavier family-household mix (71% vs 61%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Chaffey vs Renmark: common questions

Which is more walkable, Chaffey or Renmark?

Renmark scores 80/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.