Chisholm vs Fadden.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $830,000 and $1,097,500.
Chisholm (median $830,000) is roughly 24% cheaper to buy into than Fadden ($1,097,500).
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fadden (1043) sits above Chisholm (1036). Fadden skews owner-occupied (93%), Chisholm runs more rental-dense (79% owner).
For buyers
Chisholm is the lower entry point at $830,000 median, 24% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Chisholm offers the higher gross rental yield (2.69% vs 2.19%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
Fadden edges out on average school ICSEA (1043 vs 1036).
Common questions
Is Chisholm or Fadden cheaper to buy in?
Chisholm has the lower median house price at $830,000, roughly 24% below Fadden ($1,097,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Chisholm or Fadden have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fadden scores 1043 vs 1036 in Chisholm. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Chisholm or Fadden?
Gross rental yield on houses is 2.69% in Chisholm vs 2.19% in Fadden. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Chisholm against another suburb