Side by sideSuburb comparison

Chittering vs Lower Chittering.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lower Chittering edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lower Chittering (976) sits above Chittering (974).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lower Chittering edges out on average school ICSEA (976 vs 974).

Common questionsChittering vs Lower Chittering

Common questions

Does Chittering or Lower Chittering have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lower Chittering scores 976 vs 974 in Chittering. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Chittering
Metric
Lower Chittering

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$335/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$463/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,034
Population
2,408
44
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
974
Avg ICSEA
976

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).