Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lower Chittering vs Moondyne.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Moondyne edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Moondyne (985) sits above Lower Chittering (976).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Moondyne edges out on average school ICSEA (985 vs 976).

Common questionsLower Chittering vs Moondyne

Common questions

Does Lower Chittering or Moondyne have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Moondyne scores 985 vs 976 in Lower Chittering. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lower Chittering
Metric
Moondyne

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$275/wk
$463/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$234/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
6.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
2,408
Population
485
41
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
20
976
Avg ICSEA
985

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).