Side by sideSuburb comparison

Condowie vs Bumbunga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Condowie edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Condowie (984) sits above Bumbunga (982). Condowie skews owner-occupied (106%), Bumbunga runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Condowie edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 982). Condowie also has a higher family-household share (112% vs 55%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCondowie vs Bumbunga

Common questions

Does Condowie or Bumbunga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Condowie scores 984 vs 982 in Bumbunga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Condowie
Metric
Bumbunga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$183/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
106.0%
Owner occupied
55.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
61
Population
20
35
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
13
984
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).