Cross Roads vs Moonta

Moonta scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 44/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cross Roads skews owner-occupied (92%), Moonta runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

Buying in Cross Roads or Moonta?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cross Roads? The free selling guide

Cross Roads and Moonta side by side

MeasureCross RoadsMoonta
Renting
House rent$420/wk$450/wk
Unit rent$225/wk$400/wk
Owner occupied92.0%63.0%
Renter occupied7.0%33.0%
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA932932
Lifestyle and people
Walk score044
Transit score00
Bike score2035
Population155624
Median age4660
Climate
Annual rainfall359 mm359 mm
Mean max, January30.5°C30.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cross Roads has a heavier family-household mix (58% vs 44%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Cross Roads vs Moonta: common questions

Which is more walkable, Cross Roads or Moonta?

Moonta scores 44/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.