Hamley vs Moonta

Moonta scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 44/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Hamley skews owner-occupied (129%), Moonta runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

Buying in Hamley or Moonta?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Hamley? The free selling guide

Hamley and Moonta side by side

MeasureHamleyMoonta
Renting
House rent–$450/wk
Unit rent–$400/wk
Owner occupied129.0%63.0%
Renter occupied–33.0%
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA932932
Lifestyle and people
Walk score044
Transit score00
Bike score2035
Population31624
Median age6160
Climate
Annual rainfall364 mm359 mm
Mean max, January30.4°C30.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Hamley has a heavier family-household mix (64% vs 44%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Hamley vs Moonta: common questions

Which is more walkable, Hamley or Moonta?

Moonta scores 44/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.