Side by sideSuburb comparison

Culburra vs Colebatch.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Colebatch edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Colebatch (1000) sits above Culburra (975). Culburra skews owner-occupied (100%), Colebatch runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Colebatch edges out on average school ICSEA (1000 vs 975).

Common questionsCulburra vs Colebatch

Common questions

Does Culburra or Colebatch have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Colebatch scores 1000 vs 975 in Culburra. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Culburra
Metric
Colebatch

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$75/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
42.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
81
Population
56
43
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
1
975
Avg ICSEA
1000

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).