Cumborah vs Grawin Opal Fields

Grawin Opal Fields scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Cumborah or Grawin Opal Fields?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cumborah? The free selling guide

Cumborah and Grawin Opal Fields side by side

MeasureCumborahGrawin Opal Fields
Renting
Owner occupied63.0%–
Renter occupied5.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby01
Average ICSEA–790
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population198–
Median age58–
Climate
Annual rainfall437 mm415 mm
Mean max, January36.0°C36.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Cumborah vs Grawin Opal Fields: common questions

Which is more walkable, Cumborah or Grawin Opal Fields?

Grawin Opal Fields scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.