Cumborah vs Walgett

Walgett scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 56/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cumborah skews owner-occupied (63%), Walgett runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

Buying in Cumborah or Walgett?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cumborah? The free selling guide

Cumborah and Walgett side by side

MeasureCumborahWalgett
Price and market
Median house–$350,000
Median unit–$137,520
Renting
Owner occupied63.0%48.0%
Renter occupied5.0%43.0%
Schools
Schools nearby03
Average ICSEA–743
Lifestyle and people
Walk score056
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1981,824
Median age5835
Climate
Annual rainfall437 mm427 mm
Mean max, January36.0°C36.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Walgett has a heavier family-household mix (69% vs 35%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Cumborah vs Walgett: common questions

Which is more walkable, Cumborah or Walgett?

Walgett scores 56/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.