Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cunningham vs Bony Mountain.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bony Mountain edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bony Mountain (974) sits above Cunningham (957).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bony Mountain edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 957).

Common questionsCunningham vs Bony Mountain

Common questions

Does Cunningham or Bony Mountain have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bony Mountain scores 974 vs 957 in Cunningham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cunningham
Metric
Bony Mountain

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$221/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$231/wk
Owner occupied
90.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
19,195
Population
91
45
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
3
957
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).