Side by sideSuburb comparison

Dalmore vs Pakenham South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pakenham South edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pakenham South (999) sits above Dalmore (983).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pakenham South edges out on average school ICSEA (999 vs 983).

Common questionsDalmore vs Pakenham South

Common questions

Does Dalmore or Pakenham South have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pakenham South scores 999 vs 983 in Dalmore. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Dalmore
Metric
Pakenham South

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$313/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$351/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$231/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
5
142
Population
229
50
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
20
983
Avg ICSEA
999

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).