Your Property Guide

Darts Creek vs Mount Larcom

Mount Larcom scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Darts Creek or Mount Larcom?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Darts Creek? The free selling guide

Darts Creek and Mount Larcom side by side

MeasureDarts CreekMount Larcom
Renting
Owner occupied87.0%81.0%
Renter occupied–19.0%
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA909909
Lifestyle and people
Walk score04
Transit score010
Bike score00
Population165332
Median age5042
Climate
Annual rainfall812 mm850 mm
Mean max, January31.1°C31.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Darts Creek vs Mount Larcom: common questions

Which is more walkable, Darts Creek or Mount Larcom?

Mount Larcom scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Darts Creek and Mount Larcom?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide