Side by sideSuburb comparison

Devlins Pound vs Lowbank.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lowbank edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lowbank (971) sits above Devlins Pound (952). Devlins Pound skews owner-occupied (100%), Lowbank runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lowbank edges out on average school ICSEA (971 vs 952).

Common questionsDevlins Pound vs Lowbank

Common questions

Does Devlins Pound or Lowbank have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lowbank scores 971 vs 952 in Devlins Pound. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Devlins Pound
Metric
Lowbank

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
13
Population
22
46
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
3
952
Avg ICSEA
971

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).