Earlston vs Koonda

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Earlston (976) sits above Koonda (974). Earlston skews owner-occupied (103%), Koonda runs more rental-dense (29% owner).

Buying in Earlston or Koonda?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Earlston? The free selling guide

Earlston and Koonda side by side

MeasureEarlstonKoonda
Renting
Owner occupied103.0%29.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA976974
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population8226
Median age5753
Climate
Annual rainfall561 mm559 mm
Mean max, January31.1°C31.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Earlston edges out on average school ICSEA (976 vs 974). Earlston also has a higher family-household share (67% vs 29%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Earlston vs Koonda: common questions

Does Earlston or Koonda have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Earlston scores 976 vs 974 in Koonda. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.