Side by sideSuburb comparison

Eba vs Murbko.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Murbko edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Murbko (960) sits above Eba (952). Eba skews owner-occupied (100%), Murbko runs more rental-dense (85% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Murbko edges out on average school ICSEA (960 vs 952). Murbko also has a higher family-household share (66% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsEba vs Murbko

Common questions

Does Eba or Murbko have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Murbko scores 960 vs 952 in Eba. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Eba
Metric
Murbko

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$153/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$145/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
85.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
27
Population
105
50
Median age
64

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
6
952
Avg ICSEA
960

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).