Farrell Flat vs Gum Creek

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gum Creek (1005) sits above Farrell Flat (1001). Farrell Flat skews owner-occupied (77%), Gum Creek runs more rental-dense (25% owner).

Buying in Farrell Flat or Gum Creek?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Farrell Flat? The free selling guide

Farrell Flat and Gum Creek side by side

MeasureFarrell FlatGum Creek
Renting
House rent$300/wk–
Unit rent$200/wk–
Owner occupied77.0%25.0%
Renter occupied20.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby35
Average ICSEA10011005
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population20130
Median age5038
Climate
Annual rainfall470 mm443 mm
Mean max, January30.2°C30.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Gum Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (1005 vs 1001). Farrell Flat also has a higher family-household share (72% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Farrell Flat vs Gum Creek: common questions

Does Farrell Flat or Gum Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gum Creek scores 1005 vs 1001 in Farrell Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.