Fiery Flat vs Glenalbyn

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fiery Flat (967) sits above Glenalbyn (962). Glenalbyn skews owner-occupied (75%), Fiery Flat runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

Buying in Fiery Flat or Glenalbyn?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Fiery Flat? The free selling guide

Fiery Flat and Glenalbyn side by side

MeasureFiery FlatGlenalbyn
Renting
Owner occupied38.0%75.0%
Schools
Schools nearby63
Average ICSEA967962
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population2821
Median age4346
Climate
Annual rainfall414 mm449 mm
Mean max, January31.3°C30.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Fiery Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 962). Fiery Flat also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Fiery Flat vs Glenalbyn: common questions

Does Fiery Flat or Glenalbyn have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fiery Flat scores 967 vs 962 in Glenalbyn. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.