Fisher vs Chapman

Fisher (median $925,000) is roughly 30% cheaper to buy into than Chapman ($1,317,500).

Buying in Fisher or Chapman?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Fisher? The free selling guide

Fisher and Chapman side by side

MeasureFisherChapman
Price and market
Median house$925,000$1,317,500
Median unit$807,500–
Renting
House rent$415/wk$450/wk
Unit rent$415/wk$450/wk
Owner occupied78.0%88.0%
Renter occupied19.0%11.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10891093
Lifestyle and people
Walk score3816
Transit score100100
Bike score100100
Population3,2192,867
Median age4047
Climate
Annual rainfall646 mm646 mm
Mean max, January29.0°C29.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

Fisher scores higher on walkability (38/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chapman (1093) sits above Fisher (1089). Chapman skews owner-occupied (88%), Fisher runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

For buyers
Fisher is the lower entry point at $925,000 median, 30% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Fisher offers the higher gross rental yield (2.33% vs 1.78%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
Chapman edges out on average school ICSEA (1093 vs 1089). Chapman also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Fisher vs Chapman: common questions

Is Fisher or Chapman cheaper to buy in?

Fisher has the lower median house price at $925,000, roughly 30% below Chapman ($1,317,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Does Fisher or Chapman have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chapman scores 1093 vs 1089 in Fisher. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Fisher or Chapman?

Fisher scores 38/100 on walkability vs 16/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Fisher or Chapman?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.33% in Fisher vs 1.78% in Chapman. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.