Flying Fox vs Beechmont
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beechmont (1039) sits above Flying Fox (1034).
Buying in Flying Fox or Beechmont?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Flying Fox? The free selling guide
Flying Fox and Beechmont side by side
| Measure | Flying Fox | Beechmont |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | – | 90.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 9.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 20 |
| Average ICSEA | 1034 | 1039 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | – | 848 |
| Median age | – | 51 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1010 mm | 1173 mm |
| Mean max, January | 28.7°C | 27.9°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Beechmont edges out on average school ICSEA (1039 vs 1034).
Flying Fox vs Beechmont: common questions
Does Flying Fox or Beechmont have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beechmont scores 1039 vs 1034 in Flying Fox. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Flying Fox with
Choosing between Flying Fox and Beechmont?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.