Glenalbyn vs Fiery Flat

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fiery Flat (967) sits above Glenalbyn (962). Glenalbyn skews owner-occupied (75%), Fiery Flat runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

Buying in Glenalbyn or Fiery Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Glenalbyn? The free selling guide

Glenalbyn and Fiery Flat side by side

MeasureGlenalbynFiery Flat
Renting
Owner occupied75.0%38.0%
Schools
Schools nearby36
Average ICSEA962967
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population2128
Median age4643
Climate
Annual rainfall449 mm414 mm
Mean max, January30.8°C31.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Fiery Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 962). Fiery Flat also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Glenalbyn vs Fiery Flat: common questions

Does Glenalbyn or Fiery Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fiery Flat scores 967 vs 962 in Glenalbyn. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.