Green Hills Range vs Flaxley
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Flaxley (1045) sits above Green Hills Range (1037). Green Hills Range skews owner-occupied (103%), Flaxley runs more rental-dense (76% owner).
Buying in Green Hills Range or Flaxley?
Selling in Green Hills Range? The free selling guide
Green Hills Range and Flaxley side by side
| Measure | Green Hills Range | Flaxley |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 103.0% | 76.0% |
| Renter occupied | 10.0% | 12.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 10 |
| Average ICSEA | 1037 | 1045 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 88 | 177 |
| Median age | 46 | 48 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 786 mm | 786 mm |
| Mean max, January | 26.5°C | 26.5°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Flaxley edges out on average school ICSEA (1045 vs 1037).
Green Hills Range vs Flaxley: common questions
Does Green Hills Range or Flaxley have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Flaxley scores 1045 vs 1037 in Green Hills Range. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Green Hills Range with
Choosing between Green Hills Range and Flaxley?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.