Gum Creek vs Farrell Flat

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gum Creek (1005) sits above Farrell Flat (1001). Farrell Flat skews owner-occupied (77%), Gum Creek runs more rental-dense (25% owner).

Buying in Gum Creek or Farrell Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Gum Creek? The free selling guide

Gum Creek and Farrell Flat side by side

MeasureGum CreekFarrell Flat
Renting
House rent–$300/wk
Unit rent–$200/wk
Owner occupied25.0%77.0%
Renter occupied–20.0%
Schools
Schools nearby53
Average ICSEA10051001
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population30201
Median age3850
Climate
Annual rainfall443 mm470 mm
Mean max, January30.8°C30.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Gum Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (1005 vs 1001). Farrell Flat also has a higher family-household share (72% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Gum Creek vs Farrell Flat: common questions

Does Gum Creek or Farrell Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gum Creek scores 1005 vs 1001 in Farrell Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.