Side by sideSuburb comparison

Hampden vs Kuttabul.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Hampden edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Hampden (957) sits above Kuttabul (951).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Hampden edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 951).

Common questionsHampden vs Kuttabul

Common questions

Does Hampden or Kuttabul have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Hampden scores 957 vs 951 in Kuttabul. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Hampden
Metric
Kuttabul

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
Owner occupied
85.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
7,346
Population
707
44
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
7
957
Avg ICSEA
951

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).