Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kuttabul vs Mount Ossa.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kuttabul edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kuttabul (951) sits above Mount Ossa (950). Kuttabul skews owner-occupied (85%), Mount Ossa runs more rental-dense (66% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kuttabul edges out on average school ICSEA (951 vs 950).

Common questionsKuttabul vs Mount Ossa

Common questions

Does Kuttabul or Mount Ossa have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kuttabul scores 951 vs 950 in Mount Ossa. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kuttabul
Metric
Mount Ossa

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$228/wk
85.0%
Owner occupied
66.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
707
Population
250
46
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
4
951
Avg ICSEA
950

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).