Side by sideSuburb comparison

Heathwood vs Vermont.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Heathwood scores higher on walkability (20/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Vermont (1101) sits above Heathwood (1083).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Vermont edges out on average school ICSEA (1101 vs 1083).

Common questionsHeathwood vs Vermont

Common questions

Does Heathwood or Vermont have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Vermont scores 1101 vs 1083 in Heathwood. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Heathwood or Vermont?

Heathwood scores 20/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Heathwood
Metric
Vermont

Price & Market

Median house
$1,395,500
Median unit
$1,005,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
$630/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$578/wk
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

20
Walk score
6
60
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
Population
10,993
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1083
Avg ICSEA
1101

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).