Holder vs Wright.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $975,000 and $1,370,000. Holder edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Holder (median $975,000) is roughly 29% cheaper to buy into than Wright ($1,370,000).
Holder scores higher on walkability (88/100 vs 32/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Holder skews owner-occupied (80%), Wright runs more rental-dense (67% owner).
For buyers
Holder is the lower entry point at $975,000 median, 29% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Holder offers the higher gross rental yield (2.48% vs 1.75%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.
Common questions
Is Holder or Wright cheaper to buy in?
Holder has the lower median house price at $975,000, roughly 29% below Wright ($1,370,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which is more walkable, Holder or Wright?
Holder scores 88/100 on walkability vs 32/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Holder or Wright?
Gross rental yield on houses is 2.48% in Holder vs 1.75% in Wright. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Holder against another suburb