Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kallangur vs Murrumba Downs.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kallangur edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Kallangur scores higher on walkability (66/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Murrumba Downs skews owner-occupied (68%), Kallangur runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsKallangur vs Murrumba Downs

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Kallangur or Murrumba Downs?

Kallangur scores 66/100 on walkability vs 14/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Kallangur
Metric
Murrumba Downs

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$580/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$670/wk
$460/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$360/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied
27.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

66
Walk score
14
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
21,761
Population
10,795
35
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1005
Avg ICSEA
1005

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).