Mango Hill vs Murrumba Downs.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mango Hill edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Mango Hill scores higher on walkability (64/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mango Hill (1019) sits above Murrumba Downs (1005). Murrumba Downs skews owner-occupied (68%), Mango Hill runs more rental-dense (52% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mango Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (1019 vs 1005).
Common questions
Does Mango Hill or Murrumba Downs have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mango Hill scores 1019 vs 1005 in Murrumba Downs. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Mango Hill or Murrumba Downs?
Mango Hill scores 64/100 on walkability vs 14/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Mango Hill against another suburb