Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kelvinhaugh vs Cutella.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cutella edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cutella (952) sits above Kelvinhaugh (921).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cutella edges out on average school ICSEA (952 vs 921). Kelvinhaugh also has a higher family-household share (76% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKelvinhaugh vs Cutella

Common questions

Does Kelvinhaugh or Cutella have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cutella scores 952 vs 921 in Kelvinhaugh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kelvinhaugh
Metric
Cutella

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$265/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$165/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$385/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
85.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
35.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
49
Population
45
38
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
6
921
Avg ICSEA
952

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).