Your Property Guide

Kepa vs Chapman Bore

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chapman Bore (929) sits above Kepa (926). Kepa skews owner-occupied (48%), Chapman Bore runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

Buying in Kepa or Chapman Bore?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Kepa? The free selling guide

Kepa and Chapman Bore side by side

MeasureKepaChapman Bore
Renting
Owner occupied48.0%38.0%
Renter occupied28.0%63.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1113
Average ICSEA926929
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population6026
Median age4032
Climate
Annual rainfall352 mm353 mm
Mean max, January29.8°C30.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Chapman Bore edges out on average school ICSEA (929 vs 926). Chapman Bore also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Kepa vs Chapman Bore: common questions

Does Kepa or Chapman Bore have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chapman Bore scores 929 vs 926 in Kepa. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Kepa and Chapman Bore?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide