Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kianga vs Narooma.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Narooma edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Narooma (973) sits above Kianga (946). Kianga skews owner-occupied (83%), Narooma runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Narooma edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 946). Kianga also has a higher family-household share (69% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKianga vs Narooma

Common questions

Does Kianga or Narooma have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Narooma scores 973 vs 946 in Kianga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kianga
Metric
Narooma

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$290/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$290/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
72.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
785
Population
2,731
58
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
946
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).