Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kirkconnell vs Meadow Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kirkconnell edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kirkconnell (937) sits above Meadow Flat (894). Kirkconnell skews owner-occupied (117%), Meadow Flat runs more rental-dense (86% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kirkconnell edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 894). Kirkconnell also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 89%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKirkconnell vs Meadow Flat

Common questions

Does Kirkconnell or Meadow Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kirkconnell scores 937 vs 894 in Meadow Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kirkconnell
Metric
Meadow Flat

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$272/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$323/wk
117.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
219
Population
356
43
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
5
937
Avg ICSEA
894

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).