Side by sideSuburb comparison

Koroop vs Mead.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mead edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mead (987) sits above Koroop (957). Koroop skews owner-occupied (106%), Mead runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mead edges out on average school ICSEA (987 vs 957). Koroop also has a higher family-household share (106% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKoroop vs Mead

Common questions

Does Koroop or Mead have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mead scores 987 vs 957 in Koroop. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Koroop
Metric
Mead

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$183/wk
$160/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
106.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
63
Population
102
49
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
3
957
Avg ICSEA
987

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).