Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lannercost vs Wharps.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wharps edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wharps (925) sits above Lannercost (899).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wharps edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 899).

Common questionsLannercost vs Wharps

Common questions

Does Lannercost or Wharps have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wharps scores 925 vs 899 in Lannercost. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lannercost
Metric
Wharps

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$193/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
10.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
168
Population
10,923
45
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
8
899
Avg ICSEA
925

Climate

Annual rainfall
1036 mm
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).