Side by sideSuburb comparison

Leasingham vs Undalya.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Leasingham edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Leasingham (989) sits above Undalya (962). Undalya skews owner-occupied (150%), Leasingham runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Leasingham edges out on average school ICSEA (989 vs 962). Leasingham also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLeasingham vs Undalya

Common questions

Does Leasingham or Undalya have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Leasingham scores 989 vs 962 in Undalya. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Leasingham
Metric
Undalya

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$235/wk
$295/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
150.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
25
Bike score
35
114
Population
35
48
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
6
989
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

Annual rainfall
448 mm
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).