Side by sideSuburb comparison

Auburn vs Undalya.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Auburn edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Auburn scores higher on walkability (18/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Undalya skews owner-occupied (150%), Auburn runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsAuburn vs Undalya

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Auburn or Undalya?

Auburn scores 18/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Auburn
Metric
Undalya

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$415/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$235/wk
$230/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
150.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

18
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
75
Bike score
35
668
Population
35
54
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
962
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).