Your Property Guide

Logan vs Burkes Flat

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Logan (967) sits above Burkes Flat (954). Burkes Flat skews owner-occupied (133%), Logan runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

Buying in Logan or Burkes Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Logan? The free selling guide

Logan and Burkes Flat side by side

MeasureLoganBurkes Flat
Renting
Owner occupied74.0%133.0%
Schools
Schools nearby211
Average ICSEA967954
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population5920
Median age4356
Climate
Annual rainfall417 mm432 mm
Mean max, January30.5°C30.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Logan edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 954). Burkes Flat also has a higher family-household share (133% vs 52%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Logan vs Burkes Flat: common questions

Does Logan or Burkes Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Logan scores 967 vs 954 in Burkes Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Logan and Burkes Flat?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide