Luddenham vs Wallacia.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $3,450,000 and $1,150,000. Wallacia edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Wallacia (median $1,150,000) is roughly 200% cheaper to buy into than Luddenham ($3,450,000). Over the past year, Wallacia (+22.3%) ran 22.3 percentage points ahead of Luddenham (0%) on house-price growth.
Wallacia scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wallacia (1005) sits above Luddenham (1003).
For buyers
Wallacia is the lower entry point at $1,150,000 median, 200% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Wallacia carries both higher gross yield (3.59% vs 1.20%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.
For families
Wallacia edges out on average school ICSEA (1005 vs 1003). Luddenham also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Is Luddenham or Wallacia cheaper to buy in?
Wallacia has the lower median house price at $1,150,000, roughly 200% below Luddenham ($3,450,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Luddenham or Wallacia?
Over the past 12 months, Wallacia grew +22.3% vs 0% in Luddenham, a gap of 22.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Luddenham or Wallacia have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wallacia scores 1005 vs 1003 in Luddenham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Luddenham or Wallacia?
Wallacia scores 8/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Luddenham or Wallacia?
Gross rental yield on houses is 3.59% in Wallacia vs 1.20% in Luddenham. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Luddenham against another suburb