Side by sideSuburb comparison

Macs Cove vs Mountain Bay.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Macs Cove edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Macs Cove (1004) sits above Mountain Bay (1002). Mountain Bay skews owner-occupied (86%), Macs Cove runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Macs Cove edges out on average school ICSEA (1004 vs 1002). Mountain Bay also has a higher family-household share (66% vs 47%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMacs Cove vs Mountain Bay

Common questions

Does Macs Cove or Mountain Bay have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Macs Cove scores 1004 vs 1002 in Mountain Bay. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Macs Cove
Metric
Mountain Bay

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$273/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$273/wk
$206/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$232/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
121
Population
54
56
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
8
1004
Avg ICSEA
1002

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).