Side by sideSuburb comparison

Macs Cove vs Piries.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Piries skews owner-occupied (88%), Macs Cove runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Piries has a heavier family-household mix (92% vs 47%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Macs Cove
Metric
Piries

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$273/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$273/wk
$206/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$396/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
121
Population
66
56
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
7
1004
Avg ICSEA
1004

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).