Mataranka vs Jilkminggan

Mataranka scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mataranka skews owner-occupied (42%), Jilkminggan runs more rental-dense (14% owner).

Buying in Mataranka or Jilkminggan?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mataranka? The free selling guide

Mataranka and Jilkminggan side by side

MeasureMatarankaJilkminggan
Renting
House rent$80/wk$80/wk
Unit rent$100/wk$48/wk
Owner occupied42.0%14.0%
Renter occupied34.0%83.0%
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA735735
Lifestyle and people
Walk score40
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population384263
Median age3825
Climate
Annual rainfall969 mm960 mm
Mean max, January34.8°C35.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Jilkminggan has a heavier family-household mix (97% vs 62%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Mataranka vs Jilkminggan: common questions

Which is more walkable, Mataranka or Jilkminggan?

Mataranka scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.