Side by sideSuburb comparison

Meadow Flat vs Kirkconnell.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kirkconnell edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kirkconnell (937) sits above Meadow Flat (894). Kirkconnell skews owner-occupied (117%), Meadow Flat runs more rental-dense (86% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kirkconnell edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 894). Kirkconnell also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 89%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMeadow Flat vs Kirkconnell

Common questions

Does Meadow Flat or Kirkconnell have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kirkconnell scores 937 vs 894 in Meadow Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Meadow Flat
Metric
Kirkconnell

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$323/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$272/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
117.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
356
Population
219
45
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
894
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).